Ray Davis Rangers Age: Early Years & Career Highlights

Determining the ages of members of the Ray Davis Rangers is crucial for understanding team dynamics, player development, and potential strategic adjustments. Precise age data allows for comparison with other teams and facilitates informed decisions regarding player assignments and training programs. This information is also essential for evaluating historical performance and identifying trends within the team's development.

The age profile of a sports team significantly impacts team performance. Younger teams may have greater potential for growth and development, while older teams often exhibit greater experience and established playing styles. Understanding the age distribution of the Ray Davis Rangers provides insight into their current competitive standing and potential future success. Historical analysis of age groups within the team and their correlation with winning percentages can be a valuable tool for predicting outcomes and adapting training and team strategies.

Further analysis of this age data will be pertinent to the current research into optimal player development programs. This research will form the backbone of later articles exploring the team's recent successes and future prospects. Detailed information about individual ages and playing positions will be critical to understanding any observed trends.

Ray Davis Rangers Age

The age composition of the Ray Davis Rangers is a critical factor in evaluating their performance, development, and future prospects. Understanding the distribution of ages within the team is essential for strategic planning and analysis.

• Player experience
• Development potential
• Team cohesion
• Training effectiveness
• Skill maturity
• Positional suitability
• Historical trends
• Competitive advantage

Analyzing player experience reveals how age relates to skill acquisition and playing styles. Development potential emphasizes the varying growth rates of younger players. Cohesion and training effectiveness are affected by the range of ages, with older players providing guidance and younger players offering fresh perspectives. Positional suitability requires understanding the age-related physical attributes of players. Historical trends in performance correlated with age groups can reveal patterns. Stronger teams may exhibit consistent age distributions. These elements, when considered together, provide a comprehensive evaluation of the Ray Davis Rangers' current state and future potential. For example, a team with a significant concentration of young players might indicate higher growth potential, while an older team might show greater experience and stability. The age distribution ultimately impacts the team's overall competitive standing in various contexts.

1. Player experience

Player experience is inextricably linked to the age of players, particularly within a team like the Ray Davis Rangers. The level of experience a player possesses directly correlates with their proficiency and familiarity within their role, influencing their impact on the team's overall performance. Understanding this connection provides vital insight into the team's current capabilities and potential future development.

• Maturity and Skill Refinement
  

  Older players, generally, have had more time to refine their skills and adapt their techniques based on experience gained from matches and training. This translates to a higher level of consistency and reliability in their performance, especially under pressure. Conversely, younger players may lack this level of honed skill but may exhibit greater adaptability and potential for improvement. Assessing the age distribution allows for identification of players with established skill sets versus those with greater untapped potential.

• Strategic and Tactical Awareness
  

  Extensive experience translates to a deeper understanding of team strategies and opponent tactics. Older players can anticipate plays and adapt more efficiently in dynamic game situations. Young players might possess a less developed understanding of the intricacies of the game but can demonstrate agility and innovative approaches. Analyzing the interplay of different age groups can provide crucial insights into the team's adaptability in different scenarios.

• Leadership and Mentorship
  

  More experienced players often take on leadership roles, offering guidance and mentorship to their teammates. This guidance can significantly impact the development of younger players, aiding in their growth and team cohesion. Teams with a balanced age distribution often benefit from this natural mentorship, allowing for both seasoned leadership and room for young players to explore their roles.

• Physical Conditioning and Resilience
  

  Experienced players have usually developed more refined physical conditioning and mental resilience, allowing them to endure demanding game situations. This physical and mental fortitude directly translates to sustained performance throughout a match. Conversely, younger players may demonstrate bursts of energy but might struggle with the stamina demands of extended play. Understanding these variances in physical and mental resilience across different age groups informs appropriate training protocols and match strategies.

Ultimately, considering player experience in relation to age within the Ray Davis Rangers is essential for comprehending the interplay between skill, strategy, leadership, and physical performance. This nuanced perspective provides a holistic understanding of the team's strengths, weaknesses, and potential for future growth. Strategically analyzing this interplay, incorporating specific player ages, provides the basis for effective coaching and team development strategies.

2. Development Potential

The development potential of the Ray Davis Rangers is significantly influenced by the age distribution within the team. Understanding the interplay between player age and potential growth is vital for effective team management and strategic planning.

• Age-Related Skill Acquisition
  

  Younger players often demonstrate a higher capacity for learning and absorbing new skills and techniques. This rapid acquisition rate, if nurtured through appropriate training, can result in significant improvement over time. Conversely, older players, while possessing a stronger base of skills, might not demonstrate the same rate of acquisition of entirely new techniques or approaches to the game. However, older players can leverage their experiences and maturity to refine existing skills and understanding of strategic contexts.

• Physical Maturity and Growth
  

  The physical development of younger players is typically characterized by ongoing growth spurts and evolving physical attributes. This stage presents both opportunities for improvement in physical conditioning and potential vulnerabilities in terms of maintaining optimal performance, particularly in high-intensity games. Older players, while having reached peak physical development for their particular age bracket, can still see benefits in targeted strength and conditioning programs focused on maintaining agility and resilience. Players at differing stages of physical maturity within the team may require customized training approaches.

• Cognitive Development and Tactical Understanding
  

  Cognitive development continues throughout adolescence and young adulthood. Younger players are often still developing their strategic awareness, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills within the context of the game. Targeted training programs focused on these areas can be crucial for enhancing their understanding of tactical concepts and their ability to adapt to changing game situations. Older players often have a deeper understanding of the nuances of tactical play and can bring a level of experience to these strategic challenges.

• Mental Resilience and Emotional Maturity
  

  Developing mental resilience and emotional maturity is also an ongoing process across different age ranges. Younger players may face challenges adapting to pressure situations or maintaining composure during intense matches. Training can cultivate these vital mental attributes to increase the ability to respond positively to competitive situations. Older players, with more experience, often have developed coping mechanisms for adversity and can serve as valuable role models and mentors for the younger players on the team. Understanding this aspect of development within the specific age profile of the team is crucial for strategic coaching.

Ultimately, the analysis of development potential within the Ray Davis Rangers must consider the diverse range of ages within the team. Tailored training programs and strategic considerations regarding player roles and responsibilities are crucial for maximizing the growth and potential of all team members, regardless of age. By understanding the specific developmental needs of each age group, coaches can optimize the team's performance and ensure the long-term success of the Ray Davis Rangers.

3. Team Cohesion

Team cohesion, the degree to which members of the Ray Davis Rangers are unified and work effectively together, is significantly impacted by the age distribution within the team. A cohesive team often demonstrates enhanced performance and resilience, contributing substantially to the overall success of the Ray Davis Rangers. The diverse ages within a team can foster either collaborative or competitive dynamics. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective management and strategy.

The presence of a range of ages within the team can contribute to a richer tapestry of experience and skill sets, impacting cohesion. Older players may bring valuable leadership experience and a deep understanding of team strategies, potentially fostering trust and rapport among teammates. Younger players, eager to learn and contribute, may bring enthusiasm and fresh perspectives. However, differences in expectations, approaches to the game, and communication styles can arise from generational gaps. The interplay of these factors, if not adequately managed, can hinder cohesion. Effective communication, clear role definition, and consistent team-building activities are essential for mitigating potential conflicts. Successful teams often demonstrate a unified approach to challenges and a shared understanding of team goals, regardless of individual age or experience.

Practical applications of this understanding include targeted team-building exercises designed to bridge generational differences. This might involve activities encouraging interaction, communication, and mutual respect among players. Creating a team culture where players of all ages feel valued and encouraged to contribute is essential. Furthermore, recognizing the unique needs and strengths of different age groups allows for strategic player assignments that maximize the benefits of each player's skill set. A coach who appreciates the nuances in communication styles and learning approaches between age groups can more effectively adjust their leadership approach to ensure the team effectively functions together, strengthening its cohesion. Examples of such teams exist, highlighting how successful teams often proactively address the potential challenges inherent in age diversity to cultivate an environment of mutual respect and effective synergy.

In summary, the age composition of the Ray Davis Rangers significantly impacts team cohesion. Effective leadership and focused team-building activities are essential for bridging potential differences and maximizing the collective potential of the entire team. The Ray Davis Rangers, like many other teams, must recognize and proactively address the dynamic relationship between player age and overall team harmony to achieve sustained success.

4. Training effectiveness

Training effectiveness within the Ray Davis Rangers is intricately linked to the age profile of the team. Optimizing training regimens requires a nuanced understanding of how different age groups learn, absorb, and apply new information and techniques. This understanding is critical for maximizing the potential of all players, regardless of age.

• Differentiated Training Approaches
  

  Effective training programs acknowledge the varying learning styles and physical capabilities of players across different age brackets. Younger players often benefit from more structured, repetitive drills focused on fundamental skills. Older players might require more advanced tactical and strategic training, emphasizing critical thinking and decision-making within a game context. Adjusting training methodologies to reflect these differences in learning styles optimizes the developmental trajectory of each player. For example, incorporating drills with younger players designed to improve speed, agility, and reaction time, while also providing tactical context, provides effective use of training time.

• Physiological Considerations
  

  Training programs must accommodate the varying physiological development stages of players. Young athletes may experience rapid growth spurts, impacting flexibility, strength, and stamina. Appropriate training loads and rest schedules must be carefully calibrated to prevent injury and optimize performance. Older players might require programs that focus on injury prevention, maintaining existing fitness levels, and incorporating exercises that enhance reaction time and agility, keeping in mind any existing physical limitations. A robust understanding of age-specific physiological characteristics is crucial for injury avoidance and performance enhancement.

• Psychological Impact
  

  The psychological impact of training also differs based on age. Younger players might respond more readily to positive reinforcement and encouragement. Older players, with developed self-awareness, may benefit from a more complex and specific approach to feedback and performance evaluations, incorporating strategic goal setting and performance tracking. Adjusting coaching strategies to these psychological considerations enhances motivation and fosters a positive learning environment, thus fostering better performance. This may include setting realistic goals, offering targeted feedback, or providing opportunities for players to take initiative in training sessions. This nuance is often critical in maximizing motivation for each age group.

• Learning and Skill Retention
  

  Training methods need to account for variations in learning and skill retention across age groups. Younger players might require more repetition and reinforcement to master new skills. Older players, with a greater base of knowledge, might respond better to more complex drills and techniques. Adapting the curriculum and teaching methods for various age groups ensures that players acquire the skills needed at their optimal learning stage, maximizing development. For example, incorporating games into training sessions might enhance learning and engagement with new concepts in younger players, while allowing older players to practice those techniques within a more realistic game setting.

Ultimately, achieving optimal training effectiveness with the Ray Davis Rangers hinges on a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between training methodology and player age. By tailoring training programs to the specific needs and developmental stages of each age group, the team can optimize learning, minimize risk, and cultivate a conducive environment for skill development, ultimately enhancing overall performance. This understanding of varied learning styles and physiological considerations creates a more effective and impactful training program.

5. Skill Maturity

Skill maturity in the Ray Davis Rangers is intrinsically tied to the age of individual players. The progression of skills, from foundational to advanced, is often correlated with chronological age. Younger players typically exhibit a nascent understanding of the game's mechanics and strategies, leading to a less sophisticated execution of techniques. Conversely, older players, through accumulated experience, often demonstrate a more refined and complex approach. This correlation holds significant implications for team strategy and training programs. For example, a team with a predominantly younger age group might benefit from drills that emphasize basic skill acquisition, whereas a team with a higher concentration of older players might require training focused on advanced tactics and game strategy. This differentiation in training addresses the varying stages of skill development present within the team.

The importance of understanding skill maturity within the context of player age is multifaceted. Effective coaching necessitates recognizing the varying levels of competence. Incorporating developmental training, specifically tailored to the needs of different age groups, ensures appropriate progression in skill refinement. Consider a younger player who possesses raw potential but lacks the experience to execute complex maneuvers. A coach who understands the connection between skill maturity and age can create targeted exercises focused on fundamental technique improvement, laying a solid foundation for future development. Conversely, an older player with a strong foundation might require coaching tailored to refining strategic decision-making and applying technical prowess in a high-pressure competitive environment. This personalized approach to skill development, informed by age-related skill maturity, improves the overall performance and potential of each player, leading to a more robust and balanced team. Practical examples of these differentiated training approaches can be seen in various youth and professional sports programs, all highlighting the crucial nature of understanding the connection between player age and skill maturity.

In conclusion, the connection between skill maturity and player age in the Ray Davis Rangers is fundamental. Coaches must recognize that a player's age significantly influences their skill level and adapt their training and strategies accordingly. Ignoring this relationship can lead to ineffective training and hinder the overall development of the players. Acknowledging the varying levels of skill maturity across age groups is critical for optimal player development and ultimately contributes to the team's collective success.

6. Positional Suitability

Positional suitability within the Ray Davis Rangers is directly related to the age of individual players. Players' physical attributes, skill development, and mental preparedness often mature at different rates. Matching a player's current capabilities to the demands of a specific position is crucial for optimal performance. Younger players, typically lacking the physical strength or technical proficiency required for certain advanced roles, might not be ideally suited for positions demanding extensive physical exertion or complex tactical awareness. Conversely, older players, while possessing seasoned experience, may find their physical agility or stamina diminished, impacting their effectiveness in positions requiring exceptional speed or endurance. For example, a young, agile player might excel in a midfield position requiring quick transitions, while an older, more experienced player might be better suited to a defensive role emphasizing strategic awareness and positioning.

Effective team management necessitates a careful assessment of each player's age-related characteristics in relation to positional requirements. A thorough evaluation, incorporating factors such as physical attributes, skill acquisition, and tactical understanding, can lead to more effective player deployment and enhance overall team performance. Analysis of past performance and player characteristics, such as the correlation between age and successful playing positions, can inform player assignments for optimal team dynamics. Understanding positional suitability within the context of age allows coaches to make informed decisions about player development and team strategies. For example, if a team analyzes the players' age and performance correlation across different positions, it can guide the development of more individualized training programs tailored to each player's specific needs and current skill maturity. This tailored approach can lead to better results in terms of both player development and team success.

Considering the complex interplay between positional suitability and player age yields critical insights. A holistic understanding of the interplay of age and position, alongside other factors like skill maturity and tactical understanding, creates a stronger and more adaptable team. Matching players to positions congruent with their age-related attributes ensures a more cohesive and effective team dynamic, maximizing overall potential. This understanding is crucial, as it allows for the identification and nurturing of potential in younger players and the appropriate deployment of seasoned players' strengths to maximize their contributions. Failing to consider these crucial connections can lead to suboptimal performance, player dissatisfaction, and reduced team effectiveness, highlighting the practical importance of age-sensitive positional suitability in team composition and management within the Ray Davis Rangers.

7. Historical Trends

Analyzing historical trends in the Ray Davis Rangers' age distribution is essential for understanding long-term performance patterns and identifying potential future performance characteristics. Examining how age composition has correlated with past successes and failures provides valuable insights into optimal team dynamics and strategic planning. This analysis contributes to a deeper comprehension of team development and allows for informed projections of future outcomes.

• Correlation of Age and Win Rates
  

  Examining historical win rates in relation to the average age of the team can reveal patterns. A team composed predominantly of younger players might demonstrate a higher potential for growth over time but may exhibit volatility in short-term performance. Conversely, a team with a higher average age might show greater stability but could face limitations in adapting to changing strategic landscapes. Historical data can identify if certain age ranges have consistently produced superior performance or if there are discernible peaks and troughs in performance corresponding to specific age distributions.

• Player Development and Retention
  

  Historical data on player retention across age groups within the team can be valuable. High retention rates for specific age groups might indicate successful player development programs or a positive team environment. Conversely, fluctuations or significant declines in retention at certain age points might signal issues with player engagement, development strategies, or team dynamics. An understanding of these trends helps identify areas for improvement in player management and development. Examining the age at which players transition from younger development groups to more competitive tiers can illuminate potential bottlenecks or areas of effectiveness.

• Strategic Adaptability Across Age Cohorts
  

  A thorough study of historical trends can reveal patterns in strategic adaptability based on the team's age demographics. Did the team exhibit different styles of play when heavily populated by younger players versus older players? Analysis can identify strategic weaknesses or strengths associated with certain age brackets. For example, teams with a high concentration of experienced players might demonstrate resilience and a more refined understanding of complex tactical scenarios. Conversely, teams with a younger core may exhibit higher potential for innovation but might lack the same level of strategic refinement. Understanding such historical patterns allows for proactive adjustments in training and strategic approach based on anticipated age distributions.

By analyzing the interplay between these historical trends and the current age composition of the Ray Davis Rangers, coaches and analysts can develop more informed strategies, anticipate potential challenges, and make more accurate predictions about future performance. Identifying recurring patterns allows for proactive adjustments to player development, training, and game strategies, enhancing overall team effectiveness and success.

8. Competitive advantage

The age structure of the Ray Davis Rangers directly impacts their competitive advantage. Understanding how age relates to skill, experience, and team dynamics is crucial for optimizing strategy and maximizing performance. A well-balanced age distribution can create a potent combination of youthful energy and seasoned expertise, leading to a sustainable edge over rival teams. Conversely, imbalances can hinder development and limit adaptability.

• Skill Acquisition and Development Potential
  

  Teams with a higher proportion of younger players often possess significant development potential. These players are often more adaptable to new training methods and strategies. However, their relative lack of experience may affect their performance under pressure. Conversely, teams with a higher concentration of experienced players may exhibit greater tactical awareness and resilience but might struggle to adapt to new techniques or strategies as effectively. The Ray Davis Rangers' competitive advantage hinges on their ability to leverage the unique strengths of each age group, tailoring training and strategies to maximize the potential of both young and experienced players.

• Team Cohesion and Leadership Dynamics
  

  The age distribution significantly influences team dynamics. A balanced team with players of varying ages can foster valuable leadership and mentorship opportunities. Older players often act as mentors, guiding and supporting younger members, while younger players provide energy and fresh perspectives. This synergy can strengthen team cohesion and improve communication, leading to a more coordinated and effective team. An imbalanced team, lacking either younger or older players, might struggle with leadership or engagement, potentially reducing team cohesion and morale.

• Adaptability and Strategic Flexibility
  

  Teams with a range of ages typically exhibit greater strategic flexibility. A blend of young and experienced players provides a diverse range of approaches and perspectives, enabling more adaptive responses to changing game scenarios. A team dominated by a single age group may have less adaptability, potentially hindering responsiveness to unexpected developments or adjustments in gameplay.

• Physical and Mental Resilience
  

  Different ages bring varying physical and mental attributes to the game. Younger players often possess greater raw physical attributes, such as speed and agility, while older players may exhibit superior mental resilience and a deeper understanding of game dynamics. Teams with a balanced mix of youthful energy and experienced resilience are often better equipped to maintain intensity and focus throughout prolonged competitions. An overly young or overly seasoned team may struggle to endure the rigors of an intense or extended game.

Ultimately, the competitive advantage of the Ray Davis Rangers hinges on the strategic integration of various age groups. By recognizing and harnessing the unique strengths associated with each age bracket, the team can build a strong, cohesive unit capable of adapting and thriving in diverse game situations. This optimized approach can lead to greater consistency, allowing for effective strategies and improved team performance, ultimately driving a significant competitive edge.

Frequently Asked Questions about Ray Davis Rangers Age

This section addresses common questions regarding the age composition of the Ray Davis Rangers and its impact on team performance and development.

Question 1: What is the average age of the Ray Davis Rangers players?

Precise average age figures are not publicly available. Team composition and specific age data are often considered confidential information.

Question 2: How does the age distribution of the Ray Davis Rangers compare to other teams?

Comparative data on other teams' age distributions is not readily accessible. Publicly available data on age demographics may be incomplete or limited to general ranges, hindering precise comparisons. Access to comprehensive and consistent data across multiple teams is often restricted for competitive reasons.

Question 3: What impact does the team's age structure have on training programs?

Training programs are tailored to meet the specific needs and skill levels of players at various stages of development. This may involve incorporating different training methodologies and intensities depending on the age and experience of individual team members. The training program attempts to optimize learning and skill development for all members, ensuring effectiveness for players with diverse levels of experience.

Question 4: Does the age of players influence the team's tactical approaches?

Age-related factors are integral to strategic decisions regarding tactical approaches. The level of tactical understanding, experience, and physical attributes varies with age, influencing the appropriateness of certain strategic patterns or play styles for the team. Coaches often adjust tactics to capitalize on the strengths and developmental levels of players across different age brackets within the squad.

Question 5: How does player age affect the team's cohesion and dynamics?

The presence of diverse age groups can potentially affect team cohesion and dynamics. Younger players may look to older players for guidance and mentorship, while older players might learn from the fresh perspectives and enthusiasm of younger teammates. These dynamics, however, must be nurtured and managed by coaching staff to ensure optimal performance and synergy.

Question 6: Has the age structure of the Ray Davis Rangers had a noticeable impact on recent performance?

Analyzing the correlation between age distribution and performance requires extensive data analysis. This kind of assessment requires access to detailed historical data, including player ages and performance metrics over time. Publically available information may not encompass the level of detail necessary to draw definitive conclusions on the impact of age structure on team success.

In summary, the age composition of the Ray Davis Rangers is a complex factor influencing team performance. Factors such as training effectiveness, tactical approaches, team dynamics, and competitive advantage are all intricately linked to the distribution of player ages. Detailed analyses and comprehensive data are often necessary to fully understand the nuanced interplay of age and success within the team.

The following sections will delve deeper into specific aspects of the team's development, training, and performance.

Tips Regarding Ray Davis Rangers Age Structure

Optimizing team performance requires a deep understanding of the age distribution within the Ray Davis Rangers. Effective strategies necessitate consideration of the unique characteristics and needs associated with players of various ages. The following tips offer practical guidance for managing and maximizing the impact of age structure on team dynamics and performance.

Tip 1: Targeted Training Programs. Develop distinct training programs that cater to specific developmental needs across age groups. Younger players, often focused on skill acquisition, might benefit from drills emphasizing fundamental techniques and repetitions. Older players, potentially with established skills, may require training concentrated on strategic awareness, tactical applications, and maintaining peak physical condition. This differentiation ensures optimal skill development and performance for all age groups.

Tip 2: Positional Alignment. Assess the physical and technical attributes of each player in relation to the demands of various positions. Matching players to positions appropriate for their current age-related capabilities enhances effectiveness and reduces the risk of injury. This necessitates a thorough evaluation of player skills, physical attributes, and tactical understanding relative to their position.

Tip 3: Leadership and Mentorship Integration. Foster a dynamic where older players mentor younger ones, fostering a more cohesive team environment. This can involve structured mentorship programs, informal interactions, and strategic positioning of experienced players to guide and support their younger teammates. The mentorship program can help build connections, share experiences, and improve overall team cohesion.

Tip 4: Age-Specific Skill Development Plans. Individualized skill development plans should be based on age-appropriate expectations. These plans acknowledge varying developmental stages and adjust training methods accordingly. For example, younger players may focus on mastering fundamental movements and techniques, whereas older players might concentrate on enhancing tactical understanding and decision-making under pressure.

Tip 5: Performance Evaluation and Adaptation. Regularly assess individual and team performance, considering the impact of age on progress. Adjust training programs and strategies as necessary to address any identified weaknesses or needs related to the team's age structure. This ongoing evaluation ensures the team adapts effectively to changes in skill maturity and physical development within the different age groups.

Tip 6: Long-Term Planning. Develop long-term strategies that account for the natural progression of players through various age groups. This includes anticipating the potential need for adjustments in training, team structure, and player roles as players mature. Anticipating and addressing these transitions in a proactive way can lead to a more consistent and sustainable team performance over time.

By implementing these tips, the Ray Davis Rangers can optimize the development and performance of each player, leverage the unique strengths of various age groups, and ensure long-term success.

The following sections will explore the practical applications of these tips within the context of specific team development and player growth initiatives.

Conclusion

The analysis of the Ray Davis Rangers' age structure reveals a complex interplay of factors influencing team performance. The correlation between player age and skill acquisition, physical attributes, tactical understanding, and team cohesion is significant. Younger players often exhibit higher potential for growth, while more experienced players contribute with strategic acumen and leadership. The effectiveness of training programs, positional suitability, and team dynamics are all directly shaped by the distribution of ages within the team. Historical trends in age distribution, when analyzed in conjunction with performance metrics, provide insights into optimal team structures and effective strategic adaptations. Ultimately, understanding the age profile of the Ray Davis Rangers is crucial for optimizing training, player development, and team success in the long term.

Further investigation into the specific age-related characteristics of individual players, combined with a comprehensive analysis of historical data, can provide a more nuanced understanding of the team's development. The insights gained from this analysis are pivotal in guiding strategic decision-making regarding player development, training protocols, and tactical approaches. This data-driven approach to player management is essential for future success. Careful consideration of the factors influencing player age-related performance will prove invaluable in refining team strategies and ensuring the sustainable success of the Ray Davis Rangers.